Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is much better than the Galaxy S9, having a 94.9 score against 83.3. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy S9, although it's also much heavier. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better display than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a just a bit better display pixel density.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy S9, because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64 bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 400 GB.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity. The iPhone 14 Pro Max captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S9. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S9, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.