Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-16 | 2019-05-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), getting a general score of 83.3 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an older cellphone than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), but it is just a bit thinner and lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 has a bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S9 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.