Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s global score of 82.2. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S9 has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.