Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a much older and a little thicker phone than the Honor 50 Pro, but Samsung made it somewhat lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit superior CPU than Honor 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixels density. Honor 50 Pro counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Honor 50 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Honor 50 Pro has better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.