Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 568 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 76.6. Galaxy S9's construction is noticeably lighter and a little bit thinner than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Galaxy S9 has a little bit better display than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light situations, a much higher 50 MP resolution camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has an 87% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.