Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 568 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than Honor Magic6 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 76.6. Galaxy S9's design is just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Honor Magic6 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a slightly better looking display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch in the screen and a quite better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much larger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Honor Magic6 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 Pro has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has an 87 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.