Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's global score of 83.3. The LG Wing design is way newer than Samsung Galaxy S9's, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy S9 has a little bit better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
LG Wing has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Wing, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG Wing features a way better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG Wing has greater battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S9. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S9, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.