Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting an 83.3 score against 83.1. Even though Galaxy S9 is better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, we must highlight that it's also much older, a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with better video frame rates and a lot more MP back camera.
Galaxy S9 has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 400 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 34 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.