Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy S9 is notably older and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. The Galaxy S9 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a just a bit lower display density and a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.