Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy S9, getting an 87.1 score against 83.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a extremely newer device than Galaxy S9, but it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way lower display density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.