Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s global score of 76. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S9 is much older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's body is lighter and just a bit thinner. The Galaxy S9 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an extremely better CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a much tinier sensor offering a way lower image quality, a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in low-light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.