Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy S9's score of 83.3. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy S9. Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB. The Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.