Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-12-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Moto G51 5G, having a score of 83.3 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an way older device than Moto G51 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner and way lighter. The Galaxy S9 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Moto G51 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Moto G51 5G counts with a slightly better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G51 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.