Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G71 5G's 82.9 global score. The Galaxy S9 body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G71 5G, but it is a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little faster processor than Moto G71 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better pixel density. Galaxy S9 features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G71 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.