Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than the Moto G9 Power, with a global score of 83.3 against 78.6. The Galaxy S9 design is a lot lighter and thinner than Moto G9 Power, even though it was released 3 years before. The Galaxy S9 has a much sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S9 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
Moto G9 Power counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 100% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.