Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is incredibly older than the Motorola One 5G Ace, it's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a brighter display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Galaxy S9 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.