Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2022), with a overall score of 83.3 against 81.1. The Galaxy S9 is a noticeably older and just a bit thicker phone than Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung made it somewhat lighter anyway. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Galaxy S9 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 400 GB.
Motorola razr (2022) has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a way smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution back camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.