Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 568 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 83.3 against 79.2. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.