Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2, getting an 83.3 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S9's design is lighter than the OPPO Find X2, but it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.