Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a global score of 83.3 against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a way older and just a little bit thicker phone than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but Samsung was able to make it a bit lighter anyway. OPPO Find X2 Neo and Samsung Galaxy S9 both count with quite similar CPUs, and although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has a higher amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.