Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's overall score of 76. Even though Samsung Galaxy S9 is incredibly older and a bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S9 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.