Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. Galaxy S9 is a a little lighter but just a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.