Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Galaxy A13 5G, having an 83.3 score against 82.1. Galaxy S9's design is just a little thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A13 5G, even though it was released many years before. The Galaxy S9 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 2960px resolution. Galaxy S9 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy A13 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.