Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. The Galaxy S9 is a lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Galaxy S9 has a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S9 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.