Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only, with a general score of 83.3 against 82. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a noticeably heavier cellphone than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S9 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher display pixels density. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.