Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S9's 83.3 overall score. The Galaxy F62 design is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy S9's, but it's thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy F62 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 133 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.