Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. The Galaxy S9 is an way older phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Galaxy S9 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S9 has a very superior processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.