Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 568 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. The Galaxy S9 design is a lot lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Galaxy S9 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a display that's very similar to the Galaxy S9 one, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S9 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, a same size camera aperture and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.