Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-10-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi 12T Pro's 76.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S9 construction is notably lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi 12T Pro, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy S9 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi 12T Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior performance than Xiaomi 12T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi 12T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 400 GB.
Xiaomi 12T Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera. Xiaomi 12T Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.