Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's overall score of 83.3. Xiaomi 14T Pro is a notably heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S9, but they are equally thin. Galaxy S9 has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi 14T Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a way better video quality, a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.