Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's overall score of 82.7. Galaxy S9 is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a little bit thinner and lighter. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.