Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2018-03-16 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's score of 83.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is somewhat heavier but just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S9, and both were released only a few months apart. The Galaxy S9 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S9 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size camera sensor and a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy S9 also has a larger camera aperture and faster video frame rate.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S9, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.