Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-05-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's 80.8 score. The Galaxy S9 body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy S9 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.