Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 83.3 score against 81.6. Galaxy S9's design is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy S9 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S9 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.