Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 82.4. The Galaxy S9 is a incredibly older and just a bit thicker device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way worse pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.