Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a score of 83.3 against 78.2. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but both are equally thin. Galaxy S9 features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot worse pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Galaxy S9 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S9 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.