Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's score of 83.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S9, but it is incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.