Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro and Galaxy S9 both feature similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.