Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-03-30 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than ZTE Axon 11's global score of 76. Galaxy S9 is a older and just a little thicker device than the ZTE Axon 11, but Samsung was able to make it a little lighter anyway. The Galaxy S9 features a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little better performance than ZTE Axon 11, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The ZTE Axon 11 features much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 11 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S9 takes a bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.