Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 20's overall score of 77.8. Although the Galaxy S9 is older and a bit thicker than ZTE Axon 20, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S9 has a much better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display. The ZTE Axon 20 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with more memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The ZTE Axon 20 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4220mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.