Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Aqua and Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 32000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 13.59 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 5G, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 79.9. The Galaxy S9 is a just a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter phone than ZTE Axon 30 5G. The ZTE Axon 30 5G features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch of screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The ZTE Axon 30 5G features a way better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a better camera than ZTE Axon 30 5G, although it has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy S9 features more storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 400 GB.
The ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.