Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 4.87 x 2.53 x 0.42 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super Clear LCD | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 478 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.38 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 610 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy SL's 55.8 score. Google Pixel is a somewhat thinner but a bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy SL. Google Pixel counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy SL, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel features a little sharper display than Galaxy SL, because it has a much better 1080 x 1920 resolution, a much better screen pixel density and a larger screen. Google Pixel has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy SL, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy SL, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better video definition. The Google Pixel features a superior battery duration than Galaxy SL, because it has 2770mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel costs a little more money than the Samsung Galaxy SL, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.