Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 4.87 x 2.53 x 0.42 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 478 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 610 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than the Galaxy SL's general score of 55.8. Galaxy A51's design is heavier but notably thinner than the Galaxy SL. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and Galaxy SL has Android 2.2 version.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy SL, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy SL, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a much higher display pixel density and a lot bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy SL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy SL, because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A51 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy SL, because it has a 142 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.