Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Star
GT-S5282| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 2013-03-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.14 x 2.30 x 0.47 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 320 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Star, having a general score of 81.3 against 51.7. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is newer and much thinner, but also notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy Star. LG V35 ThinQ features a way better screen than Galaxy Star, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a really larger screen and a lot better pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Star, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Samsung Galaxy Star, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.