Global Score | |
51.7 | 87.3 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Samsung |
Android 4.1 | Android 5.0 |
2013-03-15 | 2015-04-11 |
4.14 x 2.30 x 0.47 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
3.62 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
-- | Aluminium and Glass |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
Display / Screen | |
3 inches | 5.1 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
LCD | Super AMOLED |
133 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
6.3 | 9.9 |
Performance | |
-- | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
512 MB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
Yes GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
7.38 | 10.08 |
Storage | |
4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
3.82 | 10.1 |
Camera | |
2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
-- | f/1.90 aperture |
-- | 28.00mm focal length |
-- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
5.06 | 10.01 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | Nano SIM |
3.4 | 6.7 |
Battery Life | |
1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
-- | Wireless Charging |
320 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
2.88 | 4.56 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | NFC |
-- | Infra-red port |
-- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Star, having an 87.3 score against 51.7. The Samsung Galaxy S6 is a way newer and incredibly thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Star, although it's also extremely heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S6 has a more recent 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy Star has Android 4.1 version, giving you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S6 has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a graphics co-processor, more RAM, a 64-bits CPU and more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Star, because it has a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a way greater screen pixel density and a way larger screen.
Galaxy S6 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a 2550mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 features a lot better camera than Galaxy Star, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a much higher 16 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S6 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.