Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro
GT-S7262| Global Score | |
| 53.2 | 65.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-11-11 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.42 inches | 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 4.64 ounces |
| White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 109.00 | $ 104.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.38 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 370 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Star Pro, having a 65.8 score against 53.2. Xiaomi Redmi 4a's body is thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Star Pro. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi 4a has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Samsung Galaxy Star Pro has Android 4.1.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy Star Pro, because it has 3 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Star Pro features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, although it has a lot smaller display, a little worse screen pixel density and a way lower 800 x 480 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Star Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB and 12 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Star Pro, because it has a 108% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Star Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.