Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-11-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.97 x 2.58 x 0.53 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a lot better than Galaxy Stratosphere II's general score of 61.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is way newer and a lot thinner than the Galaxy Stratosphere II's, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Stratosphere II, because it has a way greater display pixel density, a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a really larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Stratosphere II, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Stratosphere II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Stratosphere II, because it has a 91 percent greater battery size. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior camera than Galaxy Stratosphere II, because it has a camera with a much better resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.