Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite
GT-S7390| Global Score | |
| 54.1 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-20 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K40 has a score of 69.8, which is way better than Galaxy Trend Lite's overall score of 54.1. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but LG K40 has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy Trend Lite has Android 4.1.2. LG K40's construction is notably thinner but heavier than Galaxy Trend Lite.
Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite has a little more vivid screen than LG K40, although it has a really smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 800 x 480px and a bit less pixels per inch of display. The LG K40 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K40 has a much better performance than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a larger number of cores and 1,5 GB more RAM. LG K40 captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a lot higher 1920x1080 video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution. LG K40 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The LG K40 costs the same than the Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.