Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite, getting a overall score of 79.5 against 54.1. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a heavier but extremely thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560, a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a larger display.
Galaxy S7 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 200 GB and 32 GB internal memory. Galaxy S7 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a larger number of cores and 3,5 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a 100 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S7 is a bit more expensive than Galaxy Trend Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.