Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy W
I8150, I8150T, I8150BMotorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 2.3 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2011-08-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.55 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 3.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 252 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Single-Core 1400 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 530 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is much better than Galaxy W's score of 57.8. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while Galaxy W has Android 2.3, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Although Motorola DROID Turbo is much heavier than Galaxy W, it's a little thinner and incredibly newer.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy W, because it has more RAM, a much better graphics processing unit running at 500 megahertz and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better looking display than Galaxy W, because it has a way greater screen pixels density, a really bigger screen and a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy W, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 28 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy W, because it has a 160% more battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy W, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.